https://thechrissampson.substack.com/p/russia-launches-447-projectiles-against
DEAR READER: Please consider a basic support membership at $5 per month. As a journalist in Ukraine, I work every day (even during blackouts and drone attacks) to examine our world situation from where the fulcrum of the world’s hell pivots, and your help is vital. Today is my 1398th day in this 1444 of full-scale war (4370 since 2014), and Independent Journalism is not cheap to do, and I will keep making the posts available for all readers (even during nearly 24 hr daily blackouts), but good patrons are needed and I thank you for your time. – Chris Sampson, Kyiv, February 7, 2026
Russian forces launched one of the war’s most intensive combined air attacks overnight, deploying 408 uncrewed aerial vehicles and 39 missiles against Ukraine’s civilian energy infrastructure. The assault forced emergency reductions in nuclear power generation, knocked multiple thermal power plants offline, and required Ukraine to request emergency electricity imports from European partners.
Attack Scale and Air Defense Response
Between the evening of February 6 and early morning February 7, Ukrainian air defenses engaged a coordinated wave consisting of 250 Geran-2/Shahed-136 loitering munitions, 158 Gerbera/Italmas decoy and strike UAVs, and 39 missiles of multiple types.
Ukrainian Air Force units neutralized 382 of the 408 UAVs—a 94% interception rate—using mobile fire groups, electronic warfare systems, and anti-aircraft missiles. Missile interception proved more challenging. Air defenses destroyed 14 of 21 Kh-101/Kh-55 cruise missiles and 10 of 16 Kalibr cruise missiles. Neither of two Zircon hypersonic missiles was intercepted. Overall missile interception reached 62%.
Flight Path Analysis: Saturation and Sequencing
A publicly released air-attack trajectory map reveals deliberate patterns designed to exhaust and fragment Ukrainian air defenses across the country’s full geographic span.
Drone routes covered western oblasts including Lviv, Ternopil, Rivne, Khmelnytskyi, and Vinnytsia with dense, overlapping flight paths. Central regions including Kyiv show looping and loitering behavior consistent with decoy operations. Multiple tracks converge on eastern and southern targets after circuitous approaches.
The sequencing appears calculated: hundreds of drones arrived first, forcing sustained radar activation and interceptor launches across Ukraine’s breadth. Missiles followed during later phases when air defense systems were already engaged managing dispersed drone threats nationwide.
This tactical structure explains why high UAV interception rates coexist with successful missile strikes. Defenders cannot simultaneously maintain optimal positioning against saturation drone waves and concentrated missile salvos targeting critical nodes.
Energy Infrastructure Damage
Direct strikes damaged high-voltage substations and transmission lines, triggering emergency power outages across multiple regions. Ukraine’s grid operator requested emergency electricity imports from European partners connected through the ENTSO-E synchronized network.
Burshtyn Thermal Power Plant suffered serious damage and was knocked out of operation. Dobrotvir Thermal Power Plant also sustained damage. Both facilities represent significant baseload generation capacity.
Nuclear Safety Implications
All operating Ukrainian nuclear power units were forced to reduce generation due to grid instability caused by transmission infrastructure damage. At least one nuclear unit disconnected automatically when voltage fluctuations exceeded safe operating parameters.
Facilities associated with the Chernobyl site temporarily operated on backup diesel generators, according to International Atomic Energy Agency confirmation. While redundant safety systems functioned as designed, the incident underscores the narrow margins when external power supply is disrupted.
Ukraine operates 15 nuclear reactors providing roughly half the country’s electricity. Grid attacks that force reactor load reductions or emergency disconnections create cascading risks: backup power dependencies increase, cooling system margins tighten, and grid restoration complexity multiplies.
Regional Energy Security Risk
Ukraine’s electricity grid synchronized with the European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity (ENTSO-E) in March 2022. This integration allows emergency power flows in both directions but also means Ukrainian grid instability affects European balancing reserves and cross-border capacity planning.
President Volodymyr Zelenskyy characterized the assault as “a level of terror no terrorist would dare.” His framing emphasizes the attack’s deliberate targeting of systems with transnational consequences.
European energy officials have noted that Russian attacks on Ukraine’s grid infrastructure represent a risk to continental stability, particularly during winter demand peaks when reserve margins are tighter. While ENTSO-E members maintain independent safety protocols, prolonged Ukrainian generation deficits require reallocation of cross-border capacity and activation of standby resources.
Pattern Analysis
Overnight attacks of this scale—combining hundreds of drones with precision missile strikes—have occurred periodically throughout the winter months. The pattern targets grid infrastructure specifically during periods when heating demand stresses system capacity.
The tactical evolution is evident in flight path complexity. Earlier mass drone attacks used more direct approaches. Current operations show sophisticated routing designed to force defenders into multi-axis engagement across maximum geographic area, degrading interception efficiency for follow-on missile strikes.
Ukraine’s air defense continues to achieve high interception rates against the UAV component. Missile defense remains the limiting factor, particularly against hypersonic systems and large salvos timed to exploit air defense fragmentation.
The documented impacts on nuclear generation and cross-border grid stability indicate these attacks achieve strategic effects beyond immediate infrastructure destruction. Each forced reactor reduction and emergency import request demonstrates infrastructure interdependency that extends well beyond Ukraine’s borders.
Chris Sampson is an independent journalist based in Kyiv and Editor-in-Chief of NatSecMedia.